Author
Dr. Ahmed Hamdy Oreaba, FRCOphth, FRCS, MRCS
Latest national audit context — 2026
- Participating centres
- 229
- Eligible operations
- 546,974
- Recorded PCR events
- 3,849
- Observed PCR rate (unadjusted)
- 0.70%
- Preceding audit-year observed PCR rate
- 0.69%
- Audit period
- 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
- Audit label
- 2024 NHS year
- Document
- 2026/NOD/535, September 2026
The latest national observed rate and the model-development rate answer different questions. The 0.70% figure describes the unadjusted proportion of eligible operations affected by PCR in the 2024 NHS audit year. CataractStar calculates an individual estimated probability using the Report 17 coefficients derived from an earlier development dataset. The annual-report figure does not replace or recalibrate those coefficients.
Observed PCR fell from 1.36% in 2015 to 0.70% in 2024. This is historical national context, not an individual threshold or a target for every surgeon.
Read the 2026 NOD reportWhat the audit counts as PCR
For the National Cataract Audit, PCR is a collective term covering posterior capsule rupture with or without vitreous prolapse, or zonular rupture with vitreous prolapse.
| Event | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior capsule rupture with vitreous loss | 2,577 | 67.0% |
| Posterior capsule rupture without vitreous loss | 810 | 21.0% |
| Zonular rupture with vitreous loss | 281 | 7.3% |
| Both posterior capsule and zonular rupture with vitreous loss | 181 | 4.7% |
Why PCR matters
The 2026 NOD report describes PCR as being associated with:
- 20-fold risk of retinal detachment in the year after surgery.
- 17-fold risk of acute intraoperative suprachoroidal haemorrhage.
- 16-fold risk of losing at least 0.60 LogMAR from pre- to postoperatively.
- 7-fold risk of postoperative endophthalmitis.
- 6-fold risk of losing at least 0.30 LogMAR from pre- to postoperatively.
These are population-level associations and are not individual prognostic estimates produced by CataractStar.
Audit eligibility and exclusions
The annual audit excludes operations that are not comparable with primary phacoemulsification, including cataract extraction undertaken as part of:
- Combined phaco-trabeculectomy
- Keratoplasty
- Pars plana vitrectomy
It also excludes relevant traumatic and posterior polar cataracts where the risk of PCR is considered independent of surgical care. These exclusions account for approximately 4.5% of submitted procedures.
Audit interpretation
How NOD calculates an expected PCR rate for a group of operations
- Calculate the predicted PCR probability for each eligible operation.
- Sum the individual probabilities to obtain the expected number of PCR events.
- Divide that sum by the number of eligible operations to obtain the expected PCR rate.
Expected PCR rate = sum of individual predicted probabilities ÷ number of eligible operations
Adjusted rate = comparator × (observed rate ÷ expected rate)
Educational only. CataractStar’s current individual calculator does not reproduce official NOD surgeon or centre reporting, confidence intervals, funnel plots, eligibility processing or outlier determination. A formal NOD-adjusted rate must not be generated from a single case, and the report’s greater-than-4% governance criterion must not be applied to an individual predicted case risk.
What the estimate is, and is not
- The model provides an estimated probability, not certainty.
- Important clinical variables may be absent from the model.
- The model does not replace assessment of the individual patient, surgeon competence, supervision or local governance.
- Posterior polar and traumatic cataracts were excluded from the development dataset where PCR was expected as part of the surgery.
- This prototype uses rounded publicly reported coefficients, so its figures differ very slightly from the source’s worked examples.
- Full-precision coefficients and regulatory validation would be required before routine clinical deployment.
Coefficient table implemented in this prototype
Model version: RCOphth-NOD-Report17-published-rounded-coefficients-2025-09-10
| Term | Applied | Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | — | -6.391 |
| Operating surgeon grade — consultant | Reference | 0 |
| Operating surgeon grade — career-grade non-consultant | Yes | +0.461 |
| Operating surgeon grade — more-experienced resident | Yes | +0.910 |
| Operating surgeon grade — less-experienced resident | Yes | +1.323 |
| Age | per year | +0.015 |
| Sex category — female | Reference | 0 |
| Sex category — male | Yes | +1.114 |
| Age–sex interaction (male only) | per year | −0.013 |
| Able to lie flat and cooperate — yes | Reference | 0 |
| Able to lie flat and cooperate — no | Yes | +0.171 |
| Systemic diabetes mellitus — no | Reference | 0 |
| Systemic diabetes mellitus — yes | Yes | +0.215 |
| First treated eye | Reference | 0 |
| Second treated eye | Yes | −0.101 |
| Previous intravitreal anti-VEGF — no | Reference | 0 |
| Previous intravitreal anti-VEGF — yes | Yes | +0.356 |
| Pupil size — small | Reference | 0 |
| Pupil size — medium | Yes | −0.424 |
| Pupil size — large | Yes | −0.434 |
| Pupil size — not recorded | Yes | −0.420 |
| Anterior chamber depth | per mm | +0.107 |
| Preoperative distance VA | per LogMAR unit | +0.412 |
| Amblyopia | Yes | +0.187 |
| Brunescent, white or mature cataract | Yes | +0.879 |
| Diabetic retinopathy | Yes | +0.162 |
| Glaucoma | Yes | +0.538 |
| High myopia | Yes | +0.333 |
| Previous vitrectomy | Yes | +0.216 |
| Pseudoexfoliation or phacodonesis | Yes | +1.243 |
The published coefficient table gives +0.107 per mm of anterior chamber depth, while the accompanying narrative discusses increased observed risk with shallow anterior chambers. This prototype follows the published coefficient table exactly and this discrepancy must be clarified with RCOphth NOD before any clinical release. The 2026 Annual Report does not resolve this discrepancy; CataractStar follows the published coefficient table exactly pending clarification from RCOphth NOD.
Privacy by design
Every calculation runs in your browser. There is no database, authentication, server function, analytics, cookie, local storage or external API, and no patient-identifiable field exists anywhere in the application. Nothing you enter leaves your device, and nothing is retained once you close or reset the page.
Source publications
- Report 17 full article (PMC11621766)
- RCOphth NOD Posterior Capsular Rupture statistical model — 2025/NOD/526, 10 September 2025 (PDF)
- RCOphth NOD Ninth Annual Report of the National Cataract Audit 2026 — 2026/NOD/535, September 2026 (PDF)
- RCOphth NOD Case Complexity Adjustment — 2026/NOD/530, February 2026 (PDF)
- MHRA guidance on clinical calculators (PDF)
Before release
Before public or commercial release, confirm permission to reproduce the model content and terminology and obtain written clarification of any coefficient or documentation uncertainty from RCOphth NOD.
Prototype based on published RCOphth NOD coefficients. Not CE or UKCA marked. Not a substitute for clinical judgement. Not for use as the sole basis for patient counselling, treatment, surgeon allocation or governance decisions. Apply independent clinical judgement.
Independent prototype. Not affiliated with or endorsed by RCOphth, the National Ophthalmology Database, Medisoft or mediSIGHT.
Calculation model: RCOphth NOD Report 17 public rounded coefficients, specification dated 10 September 2025. National context updated from the RCOphth NOD Ninth Annual Report 2026, reporting the 2024 NHS year. Evidence reviewed 31 October 2026.
